The service life of engine components remains unchanged
After years of testing, that claim has been found to be true. “We can already give the green light for most mtu engines,” confirmed Arnd Lierhammer, HVO expert in the Rolls-Royce engineering team. He and his colleagues examined the components of mtu engines that had run at least 3,000 and in some cases up to 9,000 hours on HVO. The results were more than pleasing. “Used in the engine versions we have approved so far – which is in fact the majority of mtu engines – HVO does not shorten the service life of individual engine components,” said the HVO expert unequivocally. In fact, his estimate is even optimistic: “We're looking at whether some engine components run with HVO will actually have a lower maintenance requirement.”
HVO means lower fuel consumption
Fuel consumption does not increase when the engines are run on HVO. That surprised even the experts, since the energy density of HVO is actually lower than that of fossil diesel. “We were expecting fuel consumption to be 5% higher,” conceded Lierhammer. In actual fact, there is a slight decrease in mass-related fuel consumption with HVO. That is because HVO, since it does not contain pollutants, combusts more cleanly than fossil diesel, which suggests almost better utilization of the energy contained in the fuel.